home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sn.no!usenet
- From: balchen@sn.no (Jens Balchen Jr.)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 22:31:42 GMT
- Organization: Innocent Software
- Message-ID: <4ebko9$8tn@hasle.sn.no>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <4e9oji$me5@news-2.csn.net>
- Reply-To: balchen@sn.no
- NNTP-Posting-Host: krs-ppp15.oslo.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- charles stoyer <cstoyer@interpex.com> decided to share with us
- the infinite reservoars of wisdom:
-
- >BASIC stands for "Beginners All-purpose ? Interpretive Code"
-
- Actually it's "Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code".
- But VB does not deserve the name BASIC. I can't understand why
- the stupid masses still think of VB as BASIC.
-
- Jens
- --
- Everything I said are the opinions of someone else.
- I just cut-and-pasted.
-
- Jens Balchen jr. http://www.sn.no/~balchen
- balchen@sn.no http://www.sn.no/~balchen/vb/visual.htm
-
-